It’s Not Rocket Science, Except When it is: The Strange Case of Qian Xuesen

In the pantheon of batshit inanities to issue forth from the mouth and stubby fingers of one Donald J. Trump, the President’s offhand comment earlier this month insinuating that almost all Chinese students in the US are spies barely registered.

The president’s remark, given during a dinner for CEOs at President Trump’s private golf course, comes amidst an escalating trade war, concerns over Chinese theft of intellectual property, and growing unease about the extent to which the Chinese government, military, and the Chinese Communist Party through its United Front agency are expanding their influence and operations within the United States. New regulations enacted in June limit Chinese graduate students in specific high-tech fields to one-year renewable visas, a departure from Obama-era policies which allowed Chinese students to apply for five-year visas.

But targeting members of a specific community and efforts by the US government to impose restrictions on visas and subject Chinese researchers to additional scrutiny can also backfire. Consider the case of Qian Xuesen.

Qian Xuesen was one of the best and brightest rocket scientists in the United States in the 1930s and 1940s but was forced to return to China during the Red Scare of the 1950s. Qian spent the rest of his career in the PRC and provided a critical boost to China’s efforts to modernize their military rocketry and space programs. Here, he is celebrated as a hero of the nation and Qian’s research led to the production of China’s first ballistic missiles, its first satellite launch, and the development of the Silkworm anti-ship missile.

The Qian Xuesen Library beside Shanghai Jiaotong University

The son of a government official, Qian Xuesen was born in Hangzhou in 1911. He earned a mechanical engineering degree from Shanghai Jiaotong University in 1934 and at the age of 23 traveled to the United States on a Boxer Indemnity Scholarship, studying first at MIT and then at Caltech under Theodore von Kármán, who called Qian “an undisputed genius.”

First as a graduate student and then after earning his doctorate from Caltech in 1939, Qian played a critical role in early efforts of the United States to develop rocket and jet propulsion technology. During World War II, Qian assisted on the Manhattan Project while his other research focused on countering German rockets by analyzing the V-2 rocket program.

Qian’s work would eventually play a vital role in the development of ICBM technology and the rockets NASA would use for space exploration. In 1949, Qian wrote a proposal for a “winged space plane” that was one of the inspirations for NASA’s space shuttle. As a result of his research, in 1949 Qian as named the first director of the Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Jet Propulsion Centre at Caltech.

A bust of Qian inside the library bearing his name

Unfortunately, Qian’s career at the Jet Propulsion Lab collided with political developments in China and in the United States. The founding of the PRC in 1949 and the start of the Cold War ushered in a new era of fear and paranoia in the United States.

In 1950, Qian applied for permission to visit his parents in China. An FBI investigation accused him of having Communist sympathies — as a grad student he had attended a social gathering the Bureau suspected of being a Communist Party meeting — and Qian was stripped of his security clearance. Qian denied the charges, but despite the best effort of his colleagues and supporters in the scientific community, he remained under house arrest until 1955 when he was finally permitted to leave for China.

“I do not plan to come back,” Qian bitterly told a reporter as he prepared to leave the country. “I have no reason to come back…. I plan to do my best to help the Chinese people build up the nation to where they can live with dignity and happiness.”

Former Navy Secretary Dan Kimball called the decision, “The stupidest thing this country ever did.”

Upon his return to China, Qian founded the Institute of Mechanics in Beijing and became a member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. In 1964, China tested its own atomic bomb. Under Qian’s direction, Chinese researchers developed the first generation of “Long March” missiles and in 1970 supervised the launch of Chia’s first satellite.

Qian Xuesen and Chairman Mao following Qian’s return to China in 1955

Qian Xuesen retired in 1991 and lived a quiet life in Beijing with his wife who was an accomplished opera singer. In 2001, Caltech awarded him its distinguished alumni award, but Qian never returned to the United States. Qian Xuesen died in Beijing in 2009.

Qian’s story is a cautionary tale. While the United States does face real and important threats to its national security from China and other countries, targeting a particular group based on ethnicity or national origin can have unintended effects with long-term consequences. It can also, as happened to Qian Xuesen, have the potential to destroy people’s lives and careers.

[pull_quote id=1]

In 2015, the Justice Department cleared Sherry Chen of espionage charges. The Chinese-American hydrologist formerly worked at the National Weather Service but was accused of using downloading information about dams in the United States and lying about a meeting with a Chinese official. Despite her exoneration, Ms. Chen still has not been able to return to work. Last year, Xi Xiaoxing, a physics professor at Temple University, filed suit after the Justice Department accused him of being a Chinese spy only to reverse their decision later. According to the lawsuit, Xi believes that he was targeted solely because of his ethnicity.

It’s hard to imagine the humiliation and crushing sense of betrayal Qian Xuesen felt due to his treatment by the United States government or the anger at having your career snatched away due to accusations and suspicions based on little more than your national origin or ethnicity. There are more than 350,000 students attending university in the United States. In 2016, students from China earned about 10% of all doctorates awarded by US institutions. There is a clear and present threat in the efforts of the Chinese Communist Party to extend its reach into the United States. — there’s no denying that — but defending American institutions should not come at the cost of American values.

Shanghai photos by Thanakrit Gu for RADII.

You might also like:

Major TV and Movie Outlets Join Forces to “Reject Unhealthy Trends” and Set Pay Cap

Three major online media platforms and six production houses in China issues a joint statement on Saturday, announcing that they would be “resisting unreasonable pay and rejecting unhealthy industry trends” in the wake of the “Yin-Yang contracts” scandal which engulfed Fan Bingbing back in June.

Here’s the background on that:

Streaming giants iQiyi, Youku, and Tencent were joined in signing the statement by TV and film production companies Ciwen Media, Daylight Entertainment, Huace Film & TV, Linmon Pictures, NCM, and Youhug Media.

The statement commits the companies to paying actors no more than 1 million RMB (around 145,000USD) per episode and no more than 50 million RMB per series — including tax.

In late June, government authorities announced that they would be taking action against “unreasonable” pay packets, “money worship”, and the “distortion of social values”, with likely measures including a pay cap. The statement from the companies issued at the weekend looks like an attempt to head that off via self-regulation.

The full statement, posted by Sina Entertainment’s Weibo account

The statement has led to some sarcastic comments about the likelihood of a surge of regular mini-series and expressions of disbelief that actors can still command such huge sums compared to other professions such as those working in healthcare. Nevertheless, a post featuring the statement by Sina Entertainment’s Weibo on Saturday also sparked plenty of supportive comments.

Cui Yongyuan, the TV personality who kicked off the “yin-yang contracts” scandal by publishing two separate contracts allegedly showing tax evasion by and exorbitant fees for Fan Bingbing, has yet to comment on his Weibo account.

Cover photo: A promotional image for the film Hello Mr Billionaire

You might also like:

Photo of the Day: HKZHMB

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Our Photo of the Day series this week shares photos of impressive modern megastructures in China.

Completed in late 2017, this structure connecting three major cities/Special Administrative Regions is the world’s longest bridge to traverse an ocean. The name of this beast is the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macau Bridge — it might also be the world’s longest bridge name as well (we’re calling it the HKZHMB for short).

The bridge will span a whopping 34 miles when it opens this month. A total of 400,000 tons of steel were used to construct it, that’s 60 times the amount used in building the Eiffel Tower. The bridge has some strong political connotations too of course, as summed up by Hong Kong lawmaker Claudia Mo: “It links Hong Kong to China almost like an umbilical cord. You see it, and you know you’re linked up to the motherland.”

Photo: Easy Fairs

More megastructures:

Photo of the Day: 7,000 LEDs

Our Photo of the Day series this week shares photos of impressive modern megastructures in China.

Standing at 604 metres (1,982 feet), the Canton Tower in Guangzhou was the tallest structure in China until it was topped up by the Shanghai Tower. The tower’s exterior is rigged with 7,000 LED light which at night radiate colorfully/garishly depending on how you feel about such things.

Perhaps the main highlight of this structure however, is its observatory. It’s not an ordinary one where you walk around the top floor, you get to sit around on a slightly precarious-looking monorail. Visitors sit in passenger cars that circle the top of the building, where they can enjoy the views for about half an hour.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

More megastructures:

Click-through: Lyrical Suicide Notes and an Ancient Poetry Matrix

“Reversible poems”, lyrical suicide notes, and a 29×29 character poetry matrix from the fourth century all feature in a fascinating new article in The Times Literary Supplement by Nan Z. Da, assistant professor of English at University of Notre Dame, and a student and teacher of American and Chinese literature, literary theory, and Chinese and Western philosophy and social theory.

Nan uses a clutch of recently published tomes on Chinese verse to launch an engaging exploration of the poetry of exile and imminent death, of “harm, lovesickness and an aesthetic of squandering in Chinese poetry”.

Sound a little heavy? Maybe. But as Nan writes:

Maybe one does not have the training to catch all the allusions (to both Chinese and foreign literature and history), maybe one does not read difficult Chinese, or maybe one does not read Chinese (or poetry) at all. None of this is to suggest that we should not try.

It’s well worth a read of the full article, but if we had to pick out one highlight it’d be the examination of Su Hui’s “Armillary Sphere”, “an 841-character matrix nesting poems that can be made multi-directionally”. The extraordinary work of wordsmithery, which looks a bit like a Ding Yi painting or a piece by Xu Bing, “is able to generate 2,848, 3,120, 3,752, 3,800, or 7,658 poems, depending on whom you ask” and each of the works “are calculated to start at different places in accordance with the movements of the constellations”.

Here’s the full piece:

You might also like:

Photo of the Day: Dam Gorges

Our Photo of the Day series this week shares photos of impressive modern megastructures in China.

Changes in the body of water before and after the operation

Costing a whopping 31 billion USD, the Three Gorges Dam has been operational since 2003, after taking 9 years to construct. Located in Hubei province, the dam produces 97 TWh annually. For comparison, New York City uses roughly 4 TWh annually on average; the Three Gorges Dam produces 8 times more power than that produced by the Hoover Dam.

Not only does the dam produce an incredible amount of electricity, it also helps increase shipping capacity and reduce flooding significantly. However, the huge project has not been without controversy. In addition to flooding huge swathes of the surrounding scenic area and displacing an estimated 1.3 million people, the dam’s construction is also blamed for increased landslides and the extinction of the baiji, also known as the Chinese river dolphin.

Photo: Apollo Mapping

More megastructures: