Bye-bye Child Tiktokers, China Bans Under-16 Livestreamers

China has officially banned livestreaming for those who are younger than 16 years old in a bid to address concerns about the mental and physical health of minors, according to the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC).

According to a document published yesterday by the agency, youth under the age of 16 are prohibited from participating in live broadcasts across all video and streaming platforms.

The new policy also outlines regulations on underage online celebrities, stating that “kid-influencer marketing stunts will be severely prosecuted.”

The announcement quickly became a trending subject on the Chinese microblogging platform Weibo and drew the attention of China’s major news outlets.

While social media discussion indicates that many people believe the mandate to be an entirely novel concept, the CAC actually created very similar rules in late April, which took effect on May 25 and forbid young people under 16 from livestreaming.

You may also like:

The hashtag #Teenagers under 16 are banned from live streaming# had been viewed more than 260 million times on Weibo as of 3 PM on July 21. It was among the top trending topics on the social media platform, along with posts related to the large-scale flooding caused by intense rainfall in China’s central Henan province.

The associated hashtag #CAC applies strict scrutiny to marketing stunts related to kid influencers# has attracted 110 million views.

Overall, public opinion seems supportive of the new rules, although several people questioned how effectively the policy would be implemented.

“Besides this, minor pop idols should also be regulated,” read the most upvoted comment under a related post, referring to China’s oft-problematic entertainment industry, which is regularly embroiled in controversy — most recently with Kris Wu’s sexual misconduct scandal.

Related:

One user pointed out an existing loophole on the short video app Douyin (China’s TikTok), writing, “There are tons of videos of minors. The profile picture and all the content are related to children, but their parents run the accounts.”

“Will it be useful? There were policies banning minors from playing games for more than an hour and a half per day, which have not been effective at all,” wrote another netizen.

The measure is the latest move by cybersecurity authorities to tighten standards for the livestreaming industry, a process that has been going on for several years.

More oversight is not necessarily a bad thing, though, as some online personalities have gone to dangerous lengths to garner attention. In November 2020, a 16-year-old teenager from the coastal city of Ningbo was reportedly livestreaming in the middle of highways in a bid to earn more followers.

Cover image via Depositphotos

Viral Milk Tea Brand ‘Sexy Tea’ Reprimands Couriers Delivering Its Drinks by Train

One of China’s best-known milk tea shops — Sexy Tea — has had its share of controversies, including previously being dragged online for referring to women as a “bargain.”

Recently, however, it has been in the news for somewhat more positive reasons. As the brand’s popularity continues to soar, customers are so eager to drink its milk tea that they’re making orders to get the drinks delivered across provincial lines.

Founded in 2013 and based out of Changsha in Hunan province, with other stores in Wuhan and Shenzhen, Sexy Tea’s viral fame is legendary. Exacerbating that fame is the fact that customers in just the few cities mentioned above have access to the tea.

Related:

Sexy Tea’s viral presence has become so strong that unofficial couriers have begun transporting the drinks to nearby provinces using high-speed trains.

Netease reported that one courier is charging upwards of 600RMB (around 92USD) for 20 cups of milk tea to be delivered to any city connected to Changsha by high-speed rail. The original price for one cup of Sexy Tea’s milk tea purchased at a brick-and-mortar shop is roughly 12-18RMB.

The tea brand is not, however, on board with these developments and has expressed its disapproval in a Weibo post. The brand pointed out that its tea’s shelf life is short and requires a specific storage environment, making food safety an issue.

Sexy Tea stated in the Weibo post that it would enquire about large orders and ask for specific reasons for such purchases. If the customer turns out to be an unauthorized courier, shops will refuse their order.

Netizens have been vocal about their love of the viral tea brand, with one of the most upvoted comments under Sexy Tea’s post reading, “Everyone, schedule a trip to Changsha! In Changsha, you can both have fun and drink Sexy Tea beverages! Their tea is delicious!!! So delicious!!!!!!”

Another netizen wrote, “No matter what, people shouldn’t reprimand Sexy Tea. You guys wanted delivery, and when they deliver outside of Changsha, they get shouted at. I, as a Changsha resident, do not approve of this reaction.”

Cover photo via Weibo

This Popular Chinese Social Media Startup Has Suspended Its US IPO

Just two weeks after ride-hailing giant Didi was taken off Chinese app stores for breaching user privacy laws after a high-profile US initial price offering, one of China’s most popular social media and ecommerce platforms Xiaohongshu (aka Red, or 小红书 in Chinese) has shelved its own US listing plans.

Related:

According to Chinese tech and business news site TMTPost, the popular social ecommerce site will put its plan to get listed on the US stock market on hold for now.

Just a few hours after the news was reported, it became one of the trending topics on Chinese microblogging site Weibo. The hashtag #Xiaohongshu suspends its US listing plans# has garnered over 100 million views on the platform.

Chinese netizens responded to the news with mixed feelings, but most made reference to the recent Didi controversy.

“Didi is gone, (so) Xiaohongshu feels intimidated,” wrote the most upvoted comment under a related post.

One other user cited a Chinese traditional proverb to praise Xiaohongshu’s decision, “Those who suit their actions to the time are wise.”

Earlier in April this year, Xiaohongshu was reportedly planning to submit an IPO filing in the US.

Related:

As of the writing of this article, Xiaohongshu has yet to make a public statement about its decision.

Founded in 2013, Xiaohongshu is one of the fastest growing startups in China. Now, eight years after it was founded, the UGC (user generated content) site has reached over 100 million monthly active users.

With 83.31% of people on the app between the ages of 18-34, the app is very popular among young millennials and Gen Z in China, and has played a significant role in China’s influencer (or wanghong) culture.

The news comes as more and more Chinese startups are weighing up the ramifications of their US IPO plans, amidst the country’s recent regulatory crackdown on tech companies.

In just the past few weeks, Lalamove, a truck rental and delivery service provider, and Keep, China’s largest mobile sports platform, as well as the audio and podcast site Ximalaya, have reportedly also been considering a shift in their US IPO plans.

Cover Image: Thana Gu

Jackson Wang Drops New Remix of Rich Brian Song “California”

Jackson Wang has dropped his new remix of “California,” which was originally performed by 88rising artists NIKI, Rich Brian, and Warren Hue. The track was previously released as a teaser for the label’s upcoming compilation album Head in the Clouds 3. With its aesthetic shots and irresistible beat, the new music video has already garnered over 300,000 views.

Who is Jackson Wang?

Wang is widely considered to be one of the biggest popstars in Asia. Having been a part of the popular South Korean boy group, Got7, he established his career early on. Wang later made his way back to China, starting a solo musical career and becoming a regular feature on popular Chinese variety shows. He has also left his mark in fashion, serving as both creative director and lead designer for his personal fashion brand Team Wang.

He’s able to speak Cantonese, Mandarin, Shanghainese, English, and Korean due to his multicultural background, scoring him a diverse fan base. It’s also helped him build influence all over the globe.

Related:

Not surprisingly, many of Wang’s fans express their excitement for this new release under his post on microblogging site Weibo. One of the most upvoted comments writes, “I’m already listening to it!”

Another user writes, “Time to eat, fellow fans! Master chef, Jackson Wang, has prepared a good meal for us.”

Comments on Wang’s Post. Image via Weibo

Similarly, NIKI, one of the featured singers on the original track, also posted about the song on her own Weibo account, sparking passionate responses as well.

“I love u!!!!!!!!!!!” a comment reads.

Another user writes, “ohhhhh California!!”

Comments on NIKI’s Weibo post. Image via Weibo

This multicultural collaboration between artists signifies an interesting, gradual shift within the music industry. Whereas past artists typically targeted a limited ethnic audience, Wang, NIKI, Rich Brian, and Warren Hue are continuing to transcend tradition and paving a new way.

Cover photo via Weibo

People in Some Chinese Cities Will Soon Need to Be Vaccinated to Enter Certain Public Places

Some Chinese cities in Jiangxi and Zhejiang provinces have just announced a ban on unvaccinated people entering public places.

An official notice from the government in Ninghai county in Eastern Chinese city Ningbo, located in Zhejiang province, states that, “Starting from July 25th, unvaccinated people (exemptions for medical contraindications) are not allowed to enter inpatient department in hospitals, nursing homes, schools (kindergartens, nurseries, off-campus training institutions), libraries, museums, prisons and other key locations.”

Announcements from other Chinese cities have also been circulated, all carrying a similar meaning.

The news quickly picked up steam on social media, and has become one of the most trending topics on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo. The hashtag #Multiple places announces vaccination status will affect travel# has received more than 230 million views.

Related:

The general public sentiment in reaction to this news, however, has been negative. One of the reasons for this negative sentiment is that the rollout of vaccines has been somewhat uneven, with major cities like Shanghai and Beijing much faster to inoculate citizens, while other parts of China, like Guangdong province, have been slower to vaccinate its residents.

Other people are confused by the specific regulations surrounding these bans on unvaccinated people in public spaces in certain cities, and are worried that the regulations will be expanded to other parts of China.

“This is going too far,” wrote the top-voted comment under a related post on Weibo, which has garnered over 22,000 likes.

One user echoed this by saying “this is against the original intention of the term voluntary-based.”

Other netizens thought the approach was “one size fits all” and “confusing”, given that no details have been laid out regarding what it means for people with contraindications, that is, people with an underlying medical condition that disallows them from getting a Covid-19 vaccine.

In the face of public frustration, it remains to be seen how this policy will be executed and whether more cities will release similar notices.

Additional reporting by Siyuan Meng

Cover image via Unsplash

Chinese Ride-Hailing Company Didi Causes User Privacy Debate Among Netizens

Didi is China’s leading vehicle-for-hire company, providing taxi-hailing, bike-sharing and on-demand delivery services. For its 500 million users, however, the transportation app, which has offered so much convenience during its nine years of life, is in jeopardy.

On Jul 4th, China’s Cyberspace Administration and Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission released a statement saying that Didi has been removed from all mobile app stores. “The Didi app has seriously breached the law and has been illegally collecting and using its users’ personal data,” the statement reads.

Chinese netizens reacted to the news with mixed feelings. Some suggested that the company should be forgiven, given its youth and the convenience that it offers. One Weibo user commented, “Please, let’s not be too harsh. Didi is still a relatively young company, and maturation takes time. Let’s give it one more chance.”

Another wrote, “Where I live, other taxi-hailing platforms are all unbearably slow. Only Didi can get you a cab in time.”

Related:

Others reacted to the news with anger, with most netizens focusing on three issues: espionage, privacy and monopoly.

On Weibo and Zhihu, the majority of users accused Didi of potentially selling sensitive cartographic data to the US. The company wrapped up a huge US initial price offering at the end of June, raising 4.4 billion USD. However, per Chinese regulations, high-accuracy maps are classified documents, and Didi’s IPO in America is potentially a national security threat. The most recent post on Didi’s official Weibo account has been flooded with comments like “America’s watchdog” and “Get out of China.”

Other netizens pointed at Didi’s history of overpricing its services and exploiting its drivers. One blogger opined that netizens’ uniform lack of sympathy for the company originated from Didi’s record of monopolizing the transportation market. “Like other platforms,” this blogger wrote, “Didi exploits bilaterally, first its users (by overcharging them), then its drivers.”

He went on to explain how Didi’s algorithm evaluates how badly its drivers need money. “For those who desperately need money to raise a family,” he wrote, “Didi will give them the worst, least efficient trips to drive. Don’t want these trips? No problem. You need money, not us.”

You might also like:

Perhaps most significantly, the conversation that this incident has caused also centers around the question of user privacy. As this Weibo user with 1.4 million followers wrote, “Indeed, big data can bring us convenience, but cybersecurity is also an important issue that should not be ignored.”

Other netizens echoed this user, but with more blunt emotions displayed. One Zhihu user wrote, “When punishing those selling users’ personal data, our nation needs to demonstrate the same valor and authority as when we were fighting corruption.”

Another user noted that Didi should not be the only app penalized for leaking users’ privacy. “By the same logic, even if you remove 99% of the apps from China’s app stores, there’ll still be apps that have stolen users’ personal information but face no punishment.”

“This is not the first time our privacy was infringed upon,” the user added, “Starting when you get a phone number, you need to register with your name; when you use all the apps, you need to connect your location and contacts…”

“There are companies selling such information everywhere,” the user lamented, “and there’s nothing you can do.”

Cover image via Unsplash