Public Pajama Wearers Named and Shamed in Eastern China

Authorities in a city in the eastern Chinese province of Anhui are publicly naming and shaming citizens for wearing their nightclothes out on the streets. The pajama drama comes just months after officials in northeastern China attempted to ban another popular “uncivilized” fashion known as the “Beijing bikini.”

According to a report in state media outlet The Paper, seven people in the city of Suzhou (a prefecture level city in Anhui, not to be confused with the more famous garden city in Jiangsu) have been publicly shamed as part of a recent initiative to “expose uncivilized behaviors [and] improve citizens’ quality.” Their surnames, partial ID numbers and photos were published on a WeChat account operated by the local government, which encouraged the public to send in photos of anyone partaking in “uncivilized behaviors.”

pajama wearers china

A screenshot of a post on the Suzhou street management office’s Weibo, showing people wearing pyjamas in public

Other activities that could get you snapped for being “uncivilized” in the city include “lying down outside, walking your dog, blocking roads, handing out flyers, or playing cards in a large group [all in an uncivilized manner].”

Following media attention and criticism online, the message has since been deleted and the Suzhou authorities have apologized.

Related:

Suzhou isn’t the only city that’s home to citizens with a penchant for strutting the streets in their pajamas — or the only place in China that’s attempted to crack down on the practice. In Shanghai in the run-up to the 2010 World Expo, authorities attempted to discourage locals from wearing their nightclothes in public, in a move that had little lasting impact.

Many trace the practice back to pajamas being seen as an expensive imported luxury item decades ago. Later, the availability of cheap, comfortable clothing combined with the status symbol hangover and the convenient, communal feeling of many Chinese residential neighborhoods to mean the practice prevailed. And today, it’s still widespread in numerous Chinese cities. PJs’ public prevalence in southern China in particular may also be due to historical heating discrepancies in the country.

Related:

Commenters on microblogging site Weibo have largely reacted to the news with a mixture of anger and disbelief. “Murderers have their ID numbers published… is wearing pajamas in the streets illegal?!” wrote one. “Getting on with pertinent matters isn’t enough, they have to micromanage people’s lives like this,” read another highly upvoted comment. Another sought clarification regarding Suzhou’s crackdown: “Does this mean I’ll get locked up for wearing hot pants?”

WeChat Post Goes Viral After Blaming Australian Firefighters’ “Lack of Patriotism” for Bushfires

A viral WeChat post is catching heat for drawing parallels between the bushfires currently devastating Australia and the 1987 Daxing’anling wildfires in China. The supposedly “patriotic” article has been labelled brazen and unnecessary by numerous Chinese netizens.

The blog, called “If it weren’t for the Australian bush fires, I would’ve never known that China was so powerful 33 years ago,” emphasizes that the Daxing’anling fires only lasted a month. The fires, in northeastern China, claimed more than 200 lives, left another 200 injured, and rendered 50,000 people homeless.

The author of the controversial post criticizes Australian firefighters for taking days off as the country battles with some of the worst bushfires in decades, and implies that they are less hardworking and patriotic than the Chinese firefighters who fought the Daxing’anling blaze. They also state that “because of so-called ‘human rights and democracy’” in Australia, the firefighters are allowed to rest and celebrate the holidays, causing the fires to continue.

The blog was posted on Youth Courtyard, a zimeiti or “self-media,” news account that is usually run by a member of the public. The inflammatory post garnered 23 million views and over 100,000 likes within days.

But some commentators and netizens have called out the post for invoking nationalism for shock value. Others are debating the accuracy of the purported “facts” used in the Youth Courtyard report. One NetEase commenter writes, “Haven’t we been duped by this no-good self-media?”

Elsewhere on the Chinese internet, many are reacting to the fires with sympathy and compassion. Three out of the top 50 trending topics on microblogging platform Weibo are in support of the animals suffering in the wildfires, including #KoalasMightBeListedAsEndangeredSpecies, #AustralianPossumNoseBurnedInFire, and #KoalaDrinksWaterWithPetDog.

Australian officials say that the number of animals affected by the fires could be as high as one billion nationwide, and nearly a third of the koalas in the state of New South Wales may have been killed. Videos of rescue workers saving koalas and possums have been shared thousands of times on Chinese social media. One Weibo user lamented, “This is the saddest news of the month” in reference to the koalas’ dire situation.

So far, a total of 28 people have died in the fires, including several volunteer firefighters. Because Australia’s summer season has just started, it may be months until the fires fully abate.

Robots Are Using Facial Recognition to Sell You Banned Vapes

The eye of scrutiny tightens around e-cigarettes worldwide, with regulators calling for stricter control in the face of alleged vape-related deaths and a boom in underage vaping.

In China, the vaping industry took a big hit when authorities banned online sales of vapes completely. But one of the country’s biggest players has responded in a totally measured way — opening 10,000 stores staffed by vape juice-mixing robots, armed with a facial recognition program dubbed “Project Sunflower”.

Leading vape manufacturer RELX (the “Juul of China”) is here to play ball. As brick-and-mortar retail dies an abrupt death in the world’s leading e-commerce market, vaping is taking the opposite route. With sales of their products banned online, e-cigarette makers are being forced to take it back to the old school.

Related:

Well, sort of. Typical of China’s new retail scene, RELX’s stores are almost disturbingly advanced. The company launched two flagship stores in Shanghai and Beijing on Saturday, each equipped with two robots: one to customize e-liquids, and another to engrave your vape purchases (the definition of romance in 2020).

The expansion is just the beginning — RELX plans to invest 600 million RMB (85 million USD) to open 10,000 stores worldwide within three years.

What’s more, these stores are ready to absolutely vaporize any attempts at underage consumption. A press release explains that facial recognition technology will make sure that minors are “automatically identified and denied service”, in an initiative codenamed “Project Sunflower”, which is already in “full effect” at the flagship stores.

Great. Everything is great.

Miniso: How a “Muji Copycat” Became an Innovative Retail Giant

Picture walking down a New York City street, and seeing an enticing, red-and-white logo with Japanese lettering outside a brightly lit storefront. Inside are aisles of minimalist, unbranded home products and apparel that wouldn’t feel out of place in a Shibuya street market.

No, this isn’t Muji or Uniqlo — and despite the familiar layout and Japanese lettering on all the products, the store isn’t even Japanese.

The company, called Miniso, has made international headlines for its copycat marketing and its ambitious international expansion, and is now following in Xiaomi’s footsteps and planning a rumored IPO of up to 1 billion RMB (145 million USD) in either Hong Kong or the US.

Related:

Founded by Chinese entrepreneur Ye Guofu and Japanese designer Miyake Junya, Miniso opened its first store in China in 2013. It markets itself as design-forward but extremely affordable — a bricks-and-mortar chain where customers can find everything from makeup to keyboards at dollar-store prices.

According to their website, the “Japan-based” company was founded in Tokyo; however, 80-85% of its products are manufactured in China, and the company itself operates out of Guangzhou, where Guofu’s parent company Aiyaya is also headquartered.

“Knock-Off Muji” or Ingenious Marketing?

If it isn’t already clear, Miniso is an example of a successful copycat company. The retailer’s initial success was based entirely on its intentional similarity to Japanese retail chains like Muji, Daiso, and Uniqlo, with the strategic difference being 1) it isn’t Japanese and 2) its products are much cheaper. Everything from its name, aesthetic, and logo to its store layout and products evoke an amalgamation of the biggest Japanese retailers that already have instant recognition.

The translation of the Japanese characters on its logo, “Meiso,” even sounds like a combination of Muji and Daiso. Many product packages contain kanji (the Chinese characters used in the written Japanese language) that don’t really say anything in Japanese, and under closer inspection, netizens discovered that the address provided on some products for its Japanese headquarters led to an Italian restaurant. Indeed, the most common comment from web users and official webpages has been, “I didn’t know Miniso wasn’t a Japanese company.”

Comparison of Uniqlo’s and Miniso’s logos

The controversy even reached an international level in 2017. When Miniso became the first foreign-branded chain store to open a franchise in Pyongyang, North Korea, it was accused of violating both Japanese and international trade sanctions, and was forced to rebrand itself as “Evolution.”

The similarities have prompted many to ask: is this cultural appropriation, capitalist copycatting, or merely brand marketing at its most ingenious? Miniso’s exponential growth seems to indicate that as long as consumers are responding, it doesn’t matter. And they are very much responding; Miniso now has over 3,500 stores in 79 countries, bringing in an approximate revenue of 2.4 billion USD in revenue last year. For comparison, Muji has about 900 stores in 29 countries, with a revenue of 3.7 billion USD.

To its founders, Miniso is simply filling a niche in the market. Inspired by Japanese “100-yen shops” like Daiso, they feel that all customers want is simple, quality products at a cheap price, and the power of association is just another way to target customers who, at the end of the day, care mostly about price and quality.

At first glance, it’s easy to write off Miniso’s copycat nature as another consequence of China’s “knock-off culture.” But copycat companies are nothing new even outside China, and neither are Miniso’s strategies.

Related:

For example, Häagen-Dazs was famously started by Polish New Yorkers passing their company off as Dutch to give it a more European feel, even including a Dutch map on their ice cream cartons. South Korean skincare line The Face Shop and Brazilian retailer Lojas Renner are more examples of “copycat” brands that grew into their own fame.

Marvel and More Lend Legitimacy

In order to gain an edge on its higher-end competitors, Miniso has perfected the art of keeping both cost and prices low. According to Ye, the in-store turnover rate is extremely high: 21 days on average, with new products arriving every seven days. This is due in part to Miniso’s extensive in-house design team, who are able to observe consumer trends and quickly turn them around into aesthetically appropriate products.

Miniso also has a firm grasp on its key consumers: young people who want good-looking products at cheap prices. Partnerships with brands like Marvel and Sesame Street, combined with its pleasing “less is more” aesthetic, attract urban shoppers in droves.

An ad for Miniso’s Marvel crossover products

Redefining the Future of Retail

Like Xiaomi, Miniso has had its fair share of controversy, often trying to simultaneously dodge and embrace the “knock-off” label commonly relegated to Chinese companies. But in a world where such boundaries become more hazy by the day, Miniso has proven itself to understand international consumer markets in a way that could revitalize physical retail, in a world increasingly dominated by e-commerce.

The impending IPO — as well as the copious other Miniso-inspired companies that have cropped up in the past few years — may indicate that there is still hope for brick-and-mortar stores, and that China might be leading the way.

Ironically, Miniso’s original inspiration, Muji, is now somewhat in decline. According to Business of Fashion, they hope to find new ways to reach the Chinese market that may require them to adopt aspects of Miniso’s strategy, such as focusing on urban areas and decreasing their inventory size. In other words: in order to stay afloat, Muji may have to copy the copycat.

To date, Miniso already has about 1 billion RMB in funding from Tencent and Hillhouse Capital Group, and has stated that the money raised from going public will go toward its hopes for aggressive global expansion — 10,000 stores in 100 countries by the end of 2022. So if all goes to plan, expect a Miniso opening in your backyard by this time next year.

NYE in China: Kris Wu Lovebites, Gay Kisses, and Epic Drone Displays

Spring Festival and the Year of the Rat are less than a month away, and are when China’s main new year celebrations will be taking place, but before that the country saw in 2020 with a host of TV galas, pop star performances, and firework replacement drone displays.

While not as popular as the annual Spring Festival galas, people nonetheless gathered to watch their favorite idols perform on four main New Years’ Eve concert events broadcast on Hunan Television, Jiangsu Television, Dragon Television and CCTV.

China’s hottest boy band and xiaoxianrou (“little fresh meat“) poster boys TFBoys performed their hit songs “My Friends,” “First Love Confession,” and “The Best Years” on Hunan TV New Year’s Eve Concert event to a crowd of cheering youngsters. The members Wang Junkai, Wang Yuan, and Jackson Yee, all aged 19 or 18, also broke out into emotional solo performances. To round out the New Year’s celebration, the trio led a cheesy but uplifting group performance of the 1985 Taiwanese classic “Tomorrow Will Be Better” (明天會更好) with a group of veteran singers.

International star Jackson Wang also joined the fun, delivering a swag-filled performance of “BIMMER RIDE (Different Game)” and “Bullet to the Heart.” His signature gravelly voice really came through in the live stage, and at one point he stripped off his jacket and threw it in the air, to raucous cheers.

Kris Wu, one of the biggest acts in China, helped ring in the new year by performing hits like “Eternal Love” and the iconic “Big Bowl, Thick Noodle” on TV.

However, it wasn’t his rapping, but rather his hand movements and alleged hickeys that caught the attention of netizens. The hashtags #KrisWuHandTremble and #KrisWuRespondtoRedMarks both gained over 50 million hits on Weibo.

Kris himself responded to these very serious allegations with a Weibo post, posting a picture of his mark-less neck and writing that it wasn’t a hickey but “mosquito bites or allergies.” Thank goodness that’s cleared up.

In other news, Kris’ former EXO bandmate Huang Zitao also made the rounds on Weibo when a male fan snuck a kiss during his performance (see hashtag #MaleFanSneakilyKissesHuangZitao).

Taking on the traditional TV stations this year was Bilibili‘s “The Last Night of 2019” gala, the first time the streaming platform had held such an event. At its peak, it was being watched by 82 million viewers. Alongside orchestral renditions of the Game of Thrones theme and bad boy rapper GAI performing the Nezha soundtrack, China’s most popular “virtual idol” Luo Tianyi sang the folk song “Jasmine Flower” backed by (human) pipa player Fang Jinlong.

The vocaloid flitted around the stage like a real-life fairy, surrounded by realistic-looking trees and flowers. Check out the futuristic performance below:

Meanwhile in Shanghai, 2,000 drones were taking to the skies as a more environmentally-friendly alternative to fireworks. The results were absolutely spectacular, as this video (from Chinese state broadcaster CGTN) shows.

Update: It now seems that this drone display didn’t actually happen — or at least didn’t happen on New Year’s Eve itself. The video has caused confusion online in China with numerous visitors to The Bund that evening stating that they didn’t see anything like the display shown in the video below.

Happy New Year!